Many of you are aware of or have heard of Michael Paul. In case you haven’t, Michael Paul was the AOC’s Senior Technical Analyst responsible for Information Technology design across the Judicial Branch. That is, until he called attention to a whole lot of wrongdoing that Chief Justice mini-mimi is in utter denial over.
Unlicensed contractors, the worlds most expensive public buildings under construction, the rejection of federal stimulus funds by the AOC and a cover-up of epic proportions that involves making a company that 2/3rds of this states trial courts did business with making them complicit in assisting an unlicensed joint venture named “Team Jacobs” vanish into thin air. (Well, except for all of the evidence we have…)
Apparently, that unique and specialized skill set possessed by Michael Paul remain in high demand by the AOC. Several months after firing Michael Paul a head hunter contacts him about being a temp for the AOC doing his old job. Another couple of months pass and he gets another AOC head hunter contacting him again about being an agency temp and doing his old job.
Nearly a year later, Michael is contacted yet again. This time, they don’t want him to be an agency temp.
This last time an AOC head hunter wants to hire him corp to corp as a consultant doing his old job which would fall outside the scrutiny of agency temps or employees. Being paid twice as much as a regular temp, a corp to corp consultant must somehow garner greater value for the AOC than Mr. Paul’s public service.
That greater value? It avoids the scrutiny of a single agency employing lots of temps on behalf of the AOC and assists the AOC in denying that they have hired temps or employees – at a substantial extra cost.
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:02 PM, wrote:
>
> > Yes it is.
> >
> > —– Original Message —–
> > From: Michael Paul
> > To: quentiny@monogroupinc.com
> > Sent: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:56:32 -0700
> > Subject: Re: IT Technical Analyst Position
> >
> > > Is the california state agency the judicial council of california,
> > > administrative office of the courts?
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:26 PM, wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > A California State Agency office, located in San Francisco, is looking
> > for
> > > > a contracted IT Technical Analyst (1099, with a minimum of one year).
> > > > Scheduled interview will begin soon.
> > > >
> > > > Attached is a copy of the requirements for the position. If you are
> > > > interested, please reply with an attached resume in Microsoft Word
> > format at
> > > > your earliest convenient to QuentinY@MonoGroupInc.com.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > >
> > > > Quentin Yung
> > > > Mono Group Inc.
> > > > quentiny@monogroupinc.com
JusticeCalifornia
June 15, 2011
Yes JCW, I can believe it.
I do hope those in the branch who, while collecting their substantial paychecks from the public, have been uselessly wringing, or sitting on, their hands; or hedging their bets; or relying on others to fix their problems, realize what top leadership is doing to the branch and the public, and speak out.
minimimi needs to be forced to clean house, or vacate. Thus far our RG sycophant/ blackjack dealer/cocktail waitress turned cj/faux-feminist/sycophant lover has been a disaster for the branch, and for the public.
Wendy Darling
June 15, 2011
The line staff at 455 Golden Gate Avenue don’t just believe it – they know it. They see all those “temp employees” the AOC continues to hire at work, every single day. And of course there’s OCCM, which never stopped hiring.
Long live the ACJ.
JusticeCalifornia
June 15, 2011
Wendy, whatever line staff sees doesn’t matter.
Mrs. Sakauye and her select corrupt Judicial Council/AOC/trial court minions will simply continue to destroy incriminating files to protect themselves and harm the public–even abused children. Files? What files?
Hey Mark Sakauye, what do you and your law enforcement colleagues think about all of this?
For better or worse, Mrs. Sakauye, married to a law enforcement professional, showed her hand, and how she is willing to “play” it. It is now VERY ugly documented history.
https://judicialcouncilwatcher.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/10-28-10-letter-to-justice-cantil-sakauye.pdf
I cannot imagine that ANY ethical law enforcement professional would have ANY respect WHATSOEVER for what Mrs. Sakauye did regarding the child custody evidence destruction.
mrs kramer
June 16, 2011
JC, from your excellent writing:
“Justice Cantil-Sakauye, I do not intend to be impertinent. I intend to be provocative, so that if you and the Judicial Council ” accept” Mr. Judnick’s “report”, you will do so with your eyes wide open, aware of the obvious consequences. I fear that you and the Judicial Council are being urged to take an action which will be viewed as self-serving, ethically and legally improper, misleading to the public and trial courts- and which ultimately will endanger tens of thousands of California families and children for years to come.”
“If the AOC and Judicial Council are going to undertake to render official legal advice by
telling the public and the trial courts that it was perfectly legal for Marin County t o engage in the wholesale destruction of child custody evidence while active child custody cases and a state investigation of alleged mediation misconduct was ongoing, sshouldn’t it solicit the services of professional criminal investigators ( perhaps from the U.S, Dept. of Justice?)”
Where is the US Department of Justice and why won’t they take action to investigate and stop the rampant corruption in the California legal system at its highest levels? Its not like they don’t know what is occurring that is adverse to the public’s best interest, not only in California but nationwide.
http://freepdfhosting.com/9b3bd3744a.pdf
“The undisputed evidence may be found extensively in the court record file proving Kelman never even gave the purported malice causing testimony, but this is never mentioned in any opinion or ruling of this case. The perjury used to establish malice in a libel litigation over public health, was suborned by his legal counsel, Keith (“Scheuer”) even as late as September 2009 in his reply brief to the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court. The court was again for the upteenth time irrefutably evidenced of the criminal perjury by author of policy for the US Chamber of Commerce. No mention of the undisputed evidence is found in the Opinion. If fact, it was rewarded.
As such, I am asking the US Attorney General to intercede to stop the rampant corruption in the California legal system and stop the fraud in policy regarding illnesses caused by water damaged buildings. If the State of California can do this to me while using the courts to play politics; they can and most likely will, do it to anyone who challenges the direction of the US Chamber of Commerce in the future. Dangerous precedence is being set of instilling fear of retribution for speaking the truth in America.”
Stealing money from the trial court coffers is one thing, but destroying records while being evidenced they know this aids with nightmare abuse of childen; and rewarding criminal perjury while being evidenced they know this aids with the death of children for the finanicial benefit of the nation’s most powerful lobbying org, are quite another.
JusticeCalifornia
June 15, 2011
And realistically, in what legitimate legal community does alleged “charm and wit” equip one to lead a “complex judicial system” that is the biggest in the western world? Re Mrs.Sakauye:
http://www.mb.com.ph/node/268512/filam-loom
“In an interview in 2005 she said her philosophy in life is “There is no one truth, only versions of it.”
“My philosophy is to really listen closely to what people have to say and try to balance it with everything they’ve told me and give them a fair shot to tell me what they’re thinking… If I let them ramble a bit, point them in a direction, I learn why that person is there much better than in a question-and-answer format,” Cantil-Sakauye said.
Legal luminaries in California were one in heaping praise for her nomination to the state’s highest court.
Malcolm Segal, a Sacramento litigator, said he thought Schwarzenegger’s choice would please lawyers.
“Her reputation in the legal community is that she has a wonderful ability to get along with people and to bring different views together,” Segal said. “And she has, I am told, a great deal of personal charm and wit, and that’s what it takes to run a court in a complex judicial system.”
Interesting. First, I haven’t seen any charm or wit from minimimi at all. Only in-your-face arrogance, a disturbing willingness to sacrifice child safety and parent’s rights, perfectly timed faux feminism, and ongoing self-pity. Second, none of the above qualify anyone to run a complex judicial system.
Do minimimi’s branch efforts to hire on an under-the-radar contract basis to cover for past and current retaliatory indiscretions surprise anyone? Heck no.
The branch continues to underestimate those it purposefully and unethically harms.
Michael Paul
June 15, 2011
510-684-8706.
That’s my number. Give me a call when you’re willing to sign that corp to corp deal.
Judicial Council Watcher
June 20, 2011
We’ve been informed that this position that the AOC was looking to fill is not the only position that the AOC is looking to fill.
The AOC is reported to have entered into a new master services agreement for a firm to provide an addition 30+ bodies for V4 deployment services. Minimum contract length: One year. All of these positions are similar in nature to what Michael Paul was offered – consulting positions to get past hiring temps or employees.