Shouldn’t a review of Judicial Branch Governance be due NOW?

Posted on March 5, 2011


In researching for a post reply, I came across that judicial branch governance is something that is revisited every three years and that the last vote of governance was a secret vote via e-mail. Well guess what? While Judge Charles Horan’s article does not define the effective date of the vote, the issue of revisiting judicial branch governance should be in front of the executive and planning committee as we type… or quietly moved out of the committee via another secret e-mail vote that established governance?

Might we, a humble little website call upon this states’ judges to assist us in determining what our governance model will be for the next three years and call for an open debate on this issue as opposed to another secret email vote?