Audit Ordered in Response to Court Mediator’s Claims
Yet another county is alleged to have violated the law with respect to court mediation. This makes four county courts known to judicialcouncilwatcher that are looking the other way while this states’ laws are not being adhered to.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted in:
Administrative Office of the Courts, AOC, Branch Boondoggles, California State Assembly, California State Senate, California's Executive Branch, Family Courts, Judicial Council of California, Legislation, Lifting Judicial Immunity/Quasi-Immunity, State of California, Trial Courts
judicialcouncilwatcher
February 12, 2011
Tell me this would not be a John Judnick Audit…
SF Whistle
February 12, 2011
JCW—
To be accurate—-this is not a case of 4 Counties within which the court is “looking the other way while the State’s laws are not being adhered to”—
In truth–it is a matter of the Court willfully, knowingly breaking the laws—-
JusticeCalifornia
February 12, 2011
No one believes the AOC can honestly monitor anyone at this point.
Top leadership is in crisis. Having repeatedly breached the public trust, and lied about it, it has lost the public’s confidence.
And that is why, for the good of the branch, resignations must be tendered to and accepted by the CJ. Out with the old, in with the new.
SF Whistle
February 13, 2011
NEVADA COUNTY NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THIS CONDUCT MAY WELL BE COSTLY—–HERE ARE THE RESULTS IN ORANGE COUNTY
California Court of Appeal Affirms Mom’s $4.9 Million Award Against Social Services Agency
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
California Court of Appeal Affirms Mom’s $4.9 Million Award Against Social Services Agency
RE: Fogarty-Hardwick v. County of Orange, et al. Superior Court of California, County of Orange Case No. 01CC02379 (Trial before Hon. Ronald L. Bauer, Dept. CX103) In 2007 an Orange County jury returned a $4.9 million verdict in favor of Deanna Fogarty-Hardwick finding that county social workers had lied to the juvenile court in order to cause the removal of Fogarty-Hardwick’s young children – 6 and 9 years old at the time. In a unanimous scathing opinion issued Monday, June 14, 2010, Division Three of the Fourth District Court of Appeal noted that the evidence presented at trial led both the judge and jury to conclude that “something seriously wrong had been done to Fogarty-Hardwick” and that the conduct of the social workers was not “an isolated incident.” The Court of Appeal went on to chastise the County saying “This conclusion is something that should be taken very seriously.